Manual:Spanning Tree Protocol: Difference between revisions

From MikroTik Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(66 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Spanning Tree Protocol===
{{Warning|This manual is moved to https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Spanning+Tree+Protocol}}


RouterOS is capable of running bridge interfaces with (R/M)STP support in order to create loop-free and Layer2 redundant environment. It is always recommended to manually set up each bridge priority, port priority and port path cost to ensure proper Layer2 functionality at all times. Leaving STP related values to defaults are acceptable for a network that consists of of 1 to 2 bridges running with (R/M)STP enabled, but it is highly recommended to manually set these values for larger networks. Since STP elects a root bridge and root ports by checking STP related values from bridges over the network, then leaving STP settings to automatic may elect a undesired root bridge and root ports and in case of a hardware failure can result in an inaccessible network.
=Spanning Tree Protocol=
 
RouterOS is capable of running bridge interfaces with (R/M)STP support in order to create a loop-free and Layer2 redundant environment. It is always recommended to manually set up each bridge's priority, port priority, and port path cost to ensure proper Layer2 functionality at all times. Leaving STP related values to defaults are acceptable for a network that consists of 1 to 2 bridges running with (R/M)STP enabled, but it is highly recommended to manually set these values for larger networks. Since STP elects a root bridge and root ports by checking STP related values from bridges over the network, then leaving STP settings to automatic may elect an undesired root bridge and root ports and in case of a hardware failure can result in an inaccessible network.


You can check the STP status of a bridge by using the <code>/interface bridge monitor</code> command, for example:
You can check the STP status of a bridge by using the <code>/interface bridge monitor</code> command, for example:
Line 9: Line 11:
     current-mac-address: 64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
     current-mac-address: 64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
             root-bridge: yes
             root-bridge: yes
         root-bridge-id: 0x3E8.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
         root-bridge-id: 0x3000.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
         root-path-cost: 0
         root-path-cost: 0
               root-port: none
               root-port: none
Line 31: Line 33:
               forwarding: yes
               forwarding: yes
           root-path-cost: 10
           root-path-cost: 10
       designated-bridge: 0x3E8.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
       designated-bridge: 0x3000.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
         designated-cost: 0
         designated-cost: 0
   designated-port-number: 4
   designated-port-number: 4
Line 37: Line 39:
</pre>
</pre>


Note that <code>root-bridge-id</code> consists of the bridge priority and the bridge's MAC address, for non-root bridges the root bridge will be shown as <code>designated-bridge</code>. One port can have one role in a STP enabled network, below is a list of possible port roles:
Note that <code>root-bridge-id</code> consists of the bridge priority and the bridge's MAC address, for non-root bridges the root bridge will be shown as <code>designated-bridge</code>. One port can have one role in an STP enabled network, below is a list of possible port roles:


* '''root-port''' - port that is facing towards the root bridge and will be used to forward traffic from/to the root bridge.
* '''root-port''' - port that is facing towards the root bridge and will be used to forward traffic from/to the root bridge.
* '''alternate-port''' - port that is facing towards root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for root port).
* '''alternate-port''' - port that is facing towards root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for root port).
* '''backup-port''' - port that is facing away from the root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for non-root port).
* '''backup-port''' - port that is facing away from the root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for non-root port).
* '''designated-port''' - port that is facing away from the root bridge and is going to forward traffic .
* '''designated-port''' - port that is facing away from the root bridge and is going to forward traffic.
* '''disabled-port''' - disabled or inactive port.
* '''disabled-port''' - disabled or inactive port.


====STP and RSTP====
{{ Note | When using bridges that are set to use 802.1Q as EtherType, they will send out BPDUs to '''01:80:C2:00:00:00''', which are used by MSTP, RSTP and STP. When using 802.1ad as bridge VLAN protocol, the BPDUs are not compatible with 802.1Q bridges and they are sent to '''01:80:C2:00:00:08'''. (R/M)STP will not function properly if there are different bridge VLAN protocols across the Layer2 network. }}


STP and Rapid STP are used very widely across many networks, but almost all networks have switched over using only RSTP since of its benefits. STP is a very old protocol and has a convergence time (the time needed to fully learn network topology changes and to continue properly forwarding traffic) even up to 50 seconds, which was acceptable for 1980s when it was invented. RSTP has a lot smaller convergence time, a few seconds or even a few milliseconds), which is acceptable for nowadays network requirements. It is recommended to use RSTP instead of STP since it is a lot faster and is also backwards compatible with STP. One of the reason why RSTP is faster is because of reduced possible port states, below is a list of possible STP port states:
==STP and RSTP==
 
STP and Rapid STP are used very widely across many networks, but almost all networks have switched over using only RSTP since of its benefits. STP is a very old protocol and has a convergence time (the time needed to fully learn network topology changes and to continue properly forwarding traffic) even up to 50 seconds, which was acceptable for the 1980s when it was invented. RSTP has a lot of smaller convergence time, a few seconds or even a few milliseconds), which is acceptable for nowadays network requirements. It is recommended to use RSTP instead of STP since it is a lot faster and is also backward compatible with STP. One of the reasons why RSTP is faster is because of reduced possible port states, below is a list of possible STP port states:


* '''Forwarding''' - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Forwarding''' - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Listening''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Listening''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Learning''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding, but is learning MAC addresses.
* '''Learning''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding but is learning MAC addresses.
* '''Blocking''' - port is blocked since it is causing loops, but is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Blocking''' - port is blocked since it is causing loops but is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Disabled''' - port is disabled or inactive.
* '''Disabled''' - port is disabled or inactive.


In RSTP the disabled, listening and blocking port states are replaced with just one state called the '''Discarding''' state:
In RSTP the disabled, listening and blocking port states are replaced with just one state called the '''Discarding''' state:
* '''Forwarding''' - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Forwarding''' - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs (forwarding=yes).
* '''Learning''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding, but is learning MAC addresses.
* '''Learning''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding but is learning MAC addresses (learning=yes).
* '''Discarding''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
* '''Discarding''' - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs (forwarding=no).
 
In STP connectivity between bridges is determined by sending and receiving BPDUs between neighbor bridges. Designated ports are sending BPDUs to root ports. If a BPDU is not received 3 times the '''HelloTime''' in a row, then the connection is considered as unavailable and network topology convergence will commence. It is possible for STP to reduce the convergence time in certain scenarios by reducing the <code>forward-delay</code> timer, which is responsible for how long can the port be in the learning/listening state.


In STP connectivity between bridges is determined by sending and receiving BPDUs between neighbour bridges. Designated ports are sending BPDUs to root ports. If a BPDU is not received 3 times the '''HelloTime''' in a row, then connection is considered as unavailable and network topology convergence will commence. It is possible for STP to reduce the convergence time in certain scenarios by reducing the <code>forward-delay</code> timer, which is responsible for how long can port be in the learning/listening state.
In RouterOS, it is possible to specify which bridge ports are edge ports. Edge ports are ports that are not supposed to receive any BPDUs, this is beneficial since this allows STP to skip the learning and the listening state and directly go to the forwarding state. This feature is sometimes called '''PortFast'''· You can leave this parameter to the default value, which is '''auto''', but you can also manually specify it, you can set a port as edge port manually for ports that should not have any more bridges behind it, usually these are access ports.


====Default values====
==Default values==


When creating a bridge or adding a port to a bridge the following are the default values that are assigned by RouterOS:
When creating a bridge or adding a port to a bridge the following are the default values that are assigned by RouterOS:
Line 69: Line 75:
* Default bridge port path cost: '''10'''
* Default bridge port path cost: '''10'''
* Default bridge port priority: '''0x80'''
* Default bridge port priority: '''0x80'''
* BPDU message age: '''1'''
* BPDU message age increment: '''1'''
* HelloTime: '''2'''
* HelloTime: '''2'''
* Default max message age: '''20'''
* Default max message age: '''20'''


RouterOS does not change port path cost based on the link speed, for 10M, 100M, 1000M and 10000M link speeds the default path cost value when a port is added to a bridge is always '''10'''. The age of a BPDU is determined by how many bridges has the BPDU passed times the message age, since RouterOS uses '''1''' as the message age, then the BPDU packet can pass as many bridges as specified in the <code>max-message-age</code> parameter. By default this value is set to '''20''', this means that after the 20th bridge the BPDU packet will be discarded and the next bridge will become a root bridge, note that if <code>max-message-age=20</code>on is set, then it is hard to predict which ports will be the designated port on the 21st bridge and may result in traffic not being able to be forwarded properly. In case bridge filter rules are used, make sure you allow packets with DST-MAC address '''01:00:0C:CC:CC:CC''' since these packets carry BPDUs that are crucial for STP to work properly.
RouterOS does not change port path cost based on the link speed, for 10M, 100M, 1000M and 10000M link speeds the default path cost value when a port is added to a bridge are always '''10'''. The age of a BPDU is determined by how many bridges have the BPDU passed times the message age since RouterOS uses '''1''' as the message age increment, then the BPDU packet can pass as many bridges as specified in the <code>max-message-age</code> parameter. By default this value is set to '''20''', this means that after the 20th bridge the BPDU packet will be discarded and the next bridge will become a root bridge, note that if <code>max-message-age=20</code>on is set, then it is hard to predict which ports will be the designated port on the 21st bridge and may result in traffic not being able to be forwarded properly. In case bridge filter rules are used, make sure you allow packets with DST-MAC address '''01:80:C2:00:00:00''' since these packets carry BPDUs that are crucial for STP to work properly.


====Election process====
==Election process==


To properly configure STP in your network you need to understand the election process and which parameters are involved in which order. In RouterOS the root bridge will be elected based on the smallest priority and the smallest MAC address in this particular order:
To properly configure STP in your network you need to understand the election process and which parameters are involved in which order. In RouterOS the root bridge will be elected based on the smallest priority and the smallest MAC address in this particular order:
Line 82: Line 88:
# Bridge MAC address (lowest)
# Bridge MAC address (lowest)


In RouterOS root ports are elected based on lowest port path cost, lowest port priority and lowest bridge port ID in this particular order:
In RouterOS root ports are elected based on lowest Root port path cost, lowest bridge identifier, and lowest bridge port ID in this particular order:


# Port path cost (lowest)
# Root port path cost (lowest)
# Port priority (lowest)
# Bridge identifier (lowest)
# Bridge port ID (lowest)
# Bridge port ID (lowest)


{{ Note | Make sure you are using path cost and priority on the right ports. For example, setting path cost on a ports that are in a root bridge has no effect, only port priority has effect on them. Path cost has effect on ports that are facing towards the root bridge and port priority has effect on ports that are facing away from the root bridge. }}
First, when the device considers which of its ports to elect as the root port, it will check the '''root path cost''' seen by its ports. If root path cost is the same for two or more ports then the '''Bridge identifier''' of the '''upstream''' device will be checked and port connected to the lowest bridge identifier will become the root port. If the same bridge identifier is seen on two or more ports, then '''Bridge port ID''' of '''upstream''' device will be checked.


{{ Warning | In RouterOS it is possible to set any value for bridge priority between 0 and 65535, the IEEE 802.1W standard states that the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096. This can cause incompatibility issues between devices that does not support such values. To avoid incompatibility issues, it is recommended to use only these priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440 }}
Explanation of attributes:


{{ Note | When electing a root port the path cost will be checked first. If the path cost for multiple paths is the same, then port priority is checked. If port priority is the same, then bridge port ID is checked, port with the lowest values will be elected as a root port. Make sure you take into account the election process when designing your network with STP enabled. }}
Root path cost, all bridges have a Root Path Cost. Root bridge has a root path cost of 0. For all other Bridges, it is the sum of the Port Path Costs on the least-cost path to the Root Bridge. You can modify local port path cost under "/interface bridge port".  


====Example====
Bridge identifier is a combination of "bridge priority" and "bridge MAC", configurable under "/interface bridge"
 
Bridge port ID is a combination of "unique ID" and "bridge port priority", the unique ID is automatically assigned to bridge port upon adding it to the bridge, it cannot be edited. It can be seen in WinBox under "Bridge Port" "Port Number" column, or with "/interface bridge port monitor", as "port-number".
 
{{ Note |Make sure you are using path cost and priority on the right ports.
For example, setting path cost on ports that are in a root bridge has no effect, only port priority has an effect on them. Root path cost has an effect on ports that are facing towards the root bridge and port priority has an effect on ports that are facing away from the root bridge. And bridge identifier doesn’t impact devices own root port election, instead it affects root port election for downstream devices.}}
 
{{ Warning |In RouterOS it is possible to set any value for bridge priority between 0 and 65535, the IEEE 802.1W standard states that the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096. This can cause incompatibility issues between devices that do not support such values. To avoid incompatibility issues, it is recommended to use only these priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440. }}
 
==Example==
[[File:Rstp.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Alt text|Topology of a STP enabled network]]
[[File:Rstp.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Alt text|Topology of a STP enabled network]]


In this example we want to ensure Layer2 redundancy for connections from ServerA to ServerB. If a port is connected to a device that is not a bridge and not running (R)STP, then this port is considered as an edge port, in this case ServerA and ServerB is connected to an edge port. This is possible by using STP in a network. Below are configuration examples for each switch.
In this example, we want to ensure Layer2 redundancy for connections from ServerA to ServerB. If a port is connected to a device that is not a bridge and not running (R)STP, then this port is considered as an edge port, in this case ServerA and ServerB is connected to an edge port. This is possible by using STP in a network. Below are configuration examples for each switch.


* Configuration for SW1:
* Configuration for SW1:
Line 149: Line 164:
{{ Note | By the 802.1W recommendations, you should use bridge priorities in steps of 4096. To set a recommended priority it is more convenient to use hexadecimal notation, for example, 0 is 0x0000, 4096 is 0x1000, 8192 is 0x2000 and so on (0..F). }}
{{ Note | By the 802.1W recommendations, you should use bridge priorities in steps of 4096. To set a recommended priority it is more convenient to use hexadecimal notation, for example, 0 is 0x0000, 4096 is 0x1000, 8192 is 0x2000 and so on (0..F). }}


<p>
=Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol=
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanning_Tree_Protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanning_Tree_Protocol]
</p>


===Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol===
Since RouterOS v6.41 it is possible to enable Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) on a bridge interface to ensure loop-free topology across multiple VLANs, MSTP can also provide Layer2 redundancy and can be used as a load balancing technique for VLANs since it has the ability to have different paths across different VLANs. MSTP is operating very similarly to (R)STP and many concepts from (R)STP can be applied to MSTP and it is highly recommended to understand the principles behind (R)STP before using MSTP, but there are some differences that must be taken into account when designing a MSTP enabled network.


Since RouterOS v6.41rc1 it is possible to enable Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) on a bridge interface to ensure loop-free topology across multiple VLANs, MSTP can also provide Layer2 redundancy and can be used as a load balancing technique for VLANs since it has the ability to have different paths across different VLANs. MSTP is operating very similarly to (R)STP and many concepts from (R)STP can be applied to MSTP and it is highly recommended to understand the principles behind (R)STP before using MSTP, but there are some differences that must be taken into account when designing a MSTP enabled network.
In case (R)STP is used, the BPDUs are sent across all physical interfaces in a bridge to determine loops and stop ports from being able to forward traffic, if it causes a loop. In case there is a loop inside a certain VLAN, (R)STP might not be able to detect it. Some STP variants solve this problem by running a STP instance on every single VLAN (PVST), but this has been proven to inefficient and some STP variants solve this problem by running a single STP instance across all VLANs (CST), but it lacks the possibility to do load balancing for each VLAN or VLAN group. MSTP tends to solve both problems by using MST instances that can define a group of VLANs (VLAN mapping) that can be used for load balancing and redundancy, this means that each VLAN group can have a different root bridge and a different path. Note that it is beneficial to group multiple VLANs in a single instance to reduce the amount of CPU cycles for each network topology change.
 
{{ Warning | In RouterOS with MSTP enabled the bridge priority is the CIST's root bridge priority, as stated in the IEEE 802.1Q standard the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096, the 12 lowest bits are ignored. These are valid bridge priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440. When setting an invalid bridge priority, RouterOS will warn you about it and trunk the value to a valid value, but will save the original value in the configuration since invalid bridge priority values can still be used in (R)STP between devices running RouterOS, though it is recommended to use valid a bridge priority instead. }}


In case (R)STP is used, the BPDUs are sent across all physical interfaces in a bridge to determine loops and stop ports from being able to forward traffic, if it causes a loop. In case there is a loop inside a certain VLAN, (R)STP might not be able to detect it. Some STP variants solve this problem by running a STP instance on every single VLAN (PVST), but this has been proven to inefficient and some STP variants solve this problem by running a single STP instance across all VLANs (CST), but it lacks the possibility to do load balancing for each VLAN or VLAN group. MSTP tends to solve both problems by using MST instances that can define a group of VLANs (VLAN mapping) that can be used for load balancing and redundancy, this means that each VLAN group can have a different root bridge and a different path. Note that it is beneficial to group multiple VLANs in a single instance to reduce the amount of CPU cycles for each network topology change.
==MSTP Regions==


MSTP works in groups called regions, for each region there will be a regional root bridge and between regions there will be a root bridge elected. MSTP will use Internal Spanning Tree (IST) to build the network topology inside a region and Common Spanning Tree (CST) outside a region to build the network topology between multiple regions, MSTP combines these two protocols into Common and Internal Spanning Tree (CIST), which holds information about topology inside a region and between regions. From CST's perspective a region will seemingly be as a single virtual bridge, because of this MSTP is considered very scalable for large networks. In order for bridges to be in the same region, their configuration must match, BPDUs will not include VLAN mappings since they can be large, rather a computed hash is being transmitted. If a bridge receives a BPDU through a port and the configuration does not match, then MSTP will consider that port as a boundary port and that it can be used to reach other regions. Below is a list of parameters that need to match in order for MSTP to consider a BPDU from the same region:
MSTP works in groups called regions, for each region there will be a regional root bridge and between regions there will be a root bridge elected. MSTP will use Internal Spanning Tree (IST) to build the network topology inside a region and Common Spanning Tree (CST) outside a region to build the network topology between multiple regions, MSTP combines these two protocols into Common and Internal Spanning Tree (CIST), which holds information about topology inside a region and between regions. From CST's perspective a region will seemingly be as a single virtual bridge, because of this MSTP is considered very scalable for large networks. In order for bridges to be in the same region, their configuration must match, BPDUs will not include VLAN mappings since they can be large, rather a computed hash is being transmitted. If a bridge receives a BPDU through a port and the configuration does not match, then MSTP will consider that port as a boundary port and that it can be used to reach other regions. Below is a list of parameters that need to match in order for MSTP to consider a BPDU from the same region:
* Region name
* Region name
* Region revision
* Region revision
* VLAN mappings to instance IDs (computed hash)
* VLAN mappings to MST Instance IDs (computed hash)
 
It is possible to create MSTP enabled network without regions, though to be able to do load balancing per VLAN group it is required for a bridge to receive a BPDU from a bridge that is connected to it with the same parameters mentioned above. In RouterOS the default region name is empty and region revision is 0, which are valid values, but you must make sure that they match in order to get multiple bridges in a single MSTP region. A region cannot exist if their bridges are scattered over the network, these bridges must be connected at least in one way, in which they can send and receive BPDUs without leaving the region, for example, if a bridge with different region related parameters is between two bridges that have the same region related parameters, then there will exist at least 3 different MSTP regions.
 
[[File:Mstp boundry ports.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Alt text|Topology of a MSTP enabled network with boundary ports]]
 
The downside of running every single bridge in a single MSTP region is the excess CPU cycles. In comparison, PVST(+) creates a Spanning Tree Instance for each VLAN ID that exists on the network, since there will be very limited paths that can exist in a network, then this approach creates a lot of overhead and unnecessary CPU cycles, this also means that this approach does not scale very well and can overload switches with not very powerful CPUs. MSTP solves this problem by dividing the network into MSTP regions, where each bridge inside this region will exchange and process information about VLANs that exist inside the same region, but will run a single instance of Spanning Tree Protocol in background to maintain the network topology between regions. This approach has been proven to be much more effective and much more scalable, this means that regions should be used for larger networks to reduce CPU cycles.
 
In regions you can define MST Instances, which are used to configure load balancing per VLAN group and to elect the regional root bridge. It is worth mentioning that in each region there exists a pre-defined MST Instance, in most documentations this is called as '''MSTI0'''· This MST Instance is considered as the default MST Instance, there are certain parameters that apply to this special MST Instance. When traffic is passing through a MSTP enabled bridge, MSTP will look for a MST Instance that has a matching VLAN mapping, but if a VLAN mapping does not exists for a certain VLAN ID, then traffic will fall under '''MSTI0'''.
 
{{ Note | Since MSTP requires VLAN filtering on the bridge interface to be enabled, then make sure that you have allowed all required VLAN IDs in <code>/interface bridge vlan</code>, otherwise the traffic will not be forwarded and it might seem as MSTP misconfigured, although this is a VLAN filtering misconfiguration. }}
 
==Election process==
 
The election process in MSTP can be divided into two sections, intra region and inter region. For MSTP to work properly there will always need to be a regional root, that is the root bridge inside a region, and a CIST root, that is the root bridge between regions. A regional root is the root bridge inside a region, regional root bridge will be needed to properly set up load balancing for VLAN groups inside a region. CIST root will be used to configure which ports will be alternate/backups ports (inactive) and which ports will be root ports (active).
 
{{ Note | Between regions there is no load balancing per VLAN group, root port election process and port blocking between MSTP regions is done the same way as in (R)STP. If CIST has blocked a port that is inside a MSTP region to prevent traffic loops between MSTP regions, then this port can still be active for IST to do load balancing per VLAN group inside a MSTP region. }}
 
* The following parameters are involved to elect a regional root bridge or root ports inside a MSTP region:
 
{{Mr-arg-table-h
|prop=Property
|desc=Description
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table
|arg=priority
|type=integer: 0..65535 decimal format or 0x0000-0xffff hex format
|default=32768 / 0x8000
|desc=<var>/interface bridge msti</var>, MST Instance priority, used to elect a regional root inside a MSTP region.
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table
|arg=internal-path-cost
|type=integer: 1..4294967295
|default=10
|desc=<var>/interface bridge port</var>, path cost to the regional root for unknown VLAN IDs (MSTI0), used on a root port inside a MSTP region.
}}


{{ Warning | In RouterOS with MSTP enabled the bridge priority is the CIST's root bridge priority, as stated in the IEEE 802.1Q standard the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096, the 12 lowest bits are ignored. These are valid bridge priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440. When setting an invalid bridge priority, RouterOS will warn you about it and trunk the value to a valid value, but will save the original value in the configuration since invalid bridge priority values can still be used in (R)STP between devices running RouterOS, though it is recommended to use valid a bridge priority instead. }}
{{Mr-arg-table
|arg=priority
|type=integer: 0..240
|default=128
|desc=<var>/interface bridge port mst-override</var>, MST port priority for a defined MST Instance, used on a bridge port on the regional root bridge.
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table-end
|arg=internal-path-cost
|type=integer: 1..200000000
|default=10
|desc=<var>/interface bridge port mst-override</var>, MST port path cost for a defined MST Instance, used on a non-root bridge port inside a MSTP region.
}}
<br />
* The following parameters are involved to elect a CIST root bridge or CIST root ports:
 
{{Mr-arg-table-h
|prop=Property
|desc=Description
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table
|arg=priority
|type=integer: 0..65535 decimal format or 0x0000-0xffff hex format
|default=32768 / 0x8000
|desc=<var>/interface bridge</var>, CIST bridge priority, used to elect a CIST root bridge.
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table
|arg=priority
|type=integer: 0..240
|default=128
|desc=<var>/interface bridge port</var>, CIST port priority, used on a CIST root bridge to elect CIST root ports.
}}
 
{{Mr-arg-table-end
|arg=path-cost
|type=integer: 1..4294967295
|default=10
|desc=<var>/interface bridge port</var>, CIST port path cost, used on a CIST non-root bridge port to elect CIST root ports.
}}
 
{{ Note | The sequence of parameters in which MSTP checks to elect root bridge/ports are the same as in (R)STP, you can read more about it at the [[ Manual:Spanning_Tree_Protocol#Election_process | (R)STP Election Process ]] section. }}


====MST Instance====
==MST Instance==


<p id="shbox"><b>Sub-menu:</b> <code>/interface bridge msti</code></p>
<p id="shbox"><b>Sub-menu:</b> <code>/interface bridge msti</code></p>
Line 205: Line 299:
}}
}}


====MST Override====
==MST Override==


<p id="shbox"><b>Sub-menu:</b> <code>/interface bridge port mst-override</code></p>
<p id="shbox"><b>Sub-menu:</b> <code>/interface bridge port mst-override</code></p>
Line 250: Line 344:
|desc=Name of the port on which use configured MST instance's VLAN mappings and defined path cost and priority.
|desc=Name of the port on which use configured MST instance's VLAN mappings and defined path cost and priority.
}}
}}
==Monitoring==
Similarly to (R)STP, it is also possible to monitor MSTP status. By monitoring the bridge interface itself it possible to see the current CIST root bridge and the current regional root bridge for MSTI0, it is also possible to see the computed hash of MST Instance identifiers and VLAN mappings, this is useful when making sure that certain bridges are in the same MSTP region. Below you can find an example to monitoring a MSTP bridge:
<pre>
/interface bridge monitor bridge
                    state: enabled
      current-mac-address: 6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
              root-bridge: no
          root-bridge-id: 0x1000.64:D1:54:24:23:72
  regional-root-bridge-id: 0x4000.6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
          root-path-cost: 10
                root-port: ether4
              port-count: 5
    designated-port-count: 3
        mst-config-digest: 74edbeefdbf82cf63a70cf60e43a56f3
</pre>
In MSTP it is possible to monitor the MST Instance, this is useful to determine the current regional root bridge for a certain MST Instance and VLAN group, below you can find an example to monitor a MST Instance:
<pre>
/interface bridge msti monitor 1
                    state: enabled
              identifier: 2
      current-mac-address: 6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
              root-bridge: no
          root-bridge-id: 0.00:00:00:00:00:00
  regional-root-bridge-id: 0x1002.6C:3B:6B:7B:F9:08
          root-path-cost: 0
                root-port: ether2
              port-count: 5
    designated-port-count: 1
</pre>
It is also possible to monitor a certain MST Override entry, this is useful to determine the port role for a certain MST Instance when configuring root ports and alternate/backup ports in a MSTP region, below you can find an example to monitor a MST Override entry:
<pre>
/interface bridge port mst-override monitor 1
                      port: ether3
                    status: active
                identifier: 2
                      role: alternate-port
                  learning: no
                forwarding: no
  internal-root-path-cost: 15
        designated-bridge: 0x1002.6C:3B:6B:7B:F9:08
  designated-internal-cost: 0
    designated-port-number: 130
</pre>
==Example==
Lets say that we need to design a topology and configure MSTP in a way that VLAN 10,20 will be forwarded in one path, but VLAN 30,40 will be forwarded in a different path, while all other VLAN IDs will be forwarded in one of those paths. This can easily be done by setting up MST Instances and assigning port path costs, below you can find a network topology that needs to do load balancing per VLAN group with 3 separate regions as an example:
[[File:Mstp.png|700px|thumb|center|alt=Alt text|Topology of a MSTP enabled network with load balancing per VLAN group]]
Start by adding each interface to a bridge, initially you should create a (R)STP bridge without VLAN filtering enabled, this is to prevent loosing access to the CPU. Each device in this example is named by the region that it is in (Rx) and a device number (_x). For larger networks configuring MSTP can confusing because of the amount of links and devices, we recommend using [https://www.mikrotik.com/thedude/ The Dude] to monitor and design a network topology.
* Use the following commands on '''R1_1''', '''R1_3''', '''R2_1''', '''R2_3''', '''R3_1''', '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge
add name=bridge protocol-mode=rstp vlan-filtering=no
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3
add bridge=bridge interface=ether4
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''', '''R2_2''', '''R3_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge
add name=bridge protocol-mode=rstp vlan-filtering=no
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
</pre>
* Make sure you allow the required VLAN IDs on these devices, here we will consider that each device will receive tagged traffic that needs to be load balanced per VLAN group, use these commands on '''R1_1''', '''R1_3''', '''R2_1''', '''R2_3''', '''R3_1''', '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge tagged=ether1,ether2,ether3,ether4 vlan-ids=10,20,30,40
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''', '''R2_2''', '''R3_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge tagged=ether1,ether2 vlan-ids=10,20,30,40
</pre>
{{ Note | Make sure you add all the needed VLAN IDs and ports to the bridge VLAN table, otherwise your device will not forward all required VLANs and/or you will loose access to the device. You can read about how to set up management ports with bridge VLAN filtering at the [[ Manual:Interface/Bridge#Management_port | Management port ]] section. }}
We need to assign a region name for each bridge that we want to be in a single MSTP region, you can also specify the region revision, but it is optional, though they need to match. In this example if all bridges will have the same region name, then they will all be in a single MSTP bridge. In this case we want to separate a group of 3 bridges in a different MSTP region to do load balancing per VLAN group and to create diversity and scalability.
* Set appropriate region name (and region revision) for each bridge, use the following commands on each device ('''change the region name!'''):
<pre>
/interface bridge
set bridge region-name=Rx region-revision=1
</pre>
After we have created 3 different MSTP regions, we need to decide which device is going to be a regional root for each VLAN group. For consistency we are going to set the first device (_1) in each region as the regional root for VLAN 10,20 and the third device (_3) in each region as the regional root for VLAN 30,40. This can be done by creating a MST Instance for each VLAN group and assigning a bridge priority to it. The MST Instance identifier is only relevant inside a MSTP region, outside a MSTP region these identifiers can be different and mapped to a different VLAN group.
* Use the following commands on '''R1_1''', '''R2_1''', '''R3_1''':
<pre>
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x1000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x3000 vlan-mapping=30,40
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_3''', '''R2_3''', '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x3000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x1000 vlan-mapping=30,40
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''', '''R2_2''', '''R3_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x2000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x2000 vlan-mapping=30,40
</pre>
Now we need to override the port path-cost and/or port priority for each MST Instance. This can be done by adding a MST-Override entry for each port and each MST Instance. To achieve that for a certain MST Instance the traffic flow path is different, we simply need to make sure that the port path cost and/or priority is larger. We can either increase the port path cost or either decrease the port path cost to ports that are facing towards the regional root bridge. It doesn't matter if you increase or decrease all values, it is important that at the end one port's path cost is larger than the other's.
* Use the following commands on '''R1_1''', '''R2_1''', '''R3_1''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=2 interface=ether1 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=2 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=15
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''', '''R2_2''', '''R3_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=1 interface=ether1 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=2 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=9
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_3''', '''R2_3''', '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=1 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=1 interface=ether3 internal-path-cost=9
</pre>
In this case for VLAN 10,20 to reach the third device from the first device it would choose between ether1 and ether2, one port will be blocked and set as an alternate port, ether1 will have path cost as <code>5+9=14</code> and ether2 will have path cost as <code>10</code>, ether2 will be elected as the root port for MSTI1 on the third device. In case for VLAN 30,40 to reach the first device from the third device, ether1 will have path cost as <code>5+9=14</code> and ether2 will have path cost as <code>15</code>, ether1 will be elected as the root port for MSTI2 on the third device.
Now we can configure the root ports for '''MSTI0''', in which will fall under all VLANs that are not assigned to a specific MST Instance, like in our example VLAN 10,20 and VLAN 30,40. To configure this special MST Instance, you will need to specify <code>internal-path-cost</code> to a bridge port. This value is only relevant to MSTP regions, it does not have any effect outside a MSTP region. In this example will choose that all unknown VLANs will be forwarded over the same path as VLAN 30,40, we will simply increase the path cost on one of the ports.
* Use the following commands on '''R1_3''', '''R2_3''', '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether3] internal-path-cost=25
</pre>
At this point a single region MSTP can be considered as configured and in general MSTP is fully functional. It is highly recommended to configure the CIST part, but for testing purposes it can be left with the default values. Before doing any tests, you need to enable MSTP on all bridges.
*  Use the following commands on '''all''' devices:
<pre>
/interface bridge
set bridge protocol-mode=mstp vlan-filtering=yes
</pre>
When MSTP regions have been configured, you can check if they are properly configured by forwarding traffic, for example, send tagged traffic from the first device to the third device and change the VLAN ID for the tagged traffic to observe different paths based on VLAN ID. When this is working as expected, then you can continue to configure CIST related parameters to elect a CIST root bridge and CIST root ports. For consistency we will choose the first device in the first region to be the CIST root bridge and to ensure the consistency in case of failure we can set a higher priority to all other  bridges.
* Use the following commands on '''R1_1''':
<pre>
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x1000
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x2000
</pre>
* ...
* Use the following commands on '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x9000
</pre>
We also need to elect a root port on each bridge, for simplicity we will choose the port that is closest to '''Ŗ1_1''' as the root port and has the least hops. At this point the procedure to elect root ports is the same as the procedure in (R)STP.
* Use the following commands on '''R3_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether2] path-cost=30
set [find where interface=ether3] path-cost=40
set [find where interface=ether4] path-cost=20
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_3''' and '''R2_3''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether2] path-cost=20
set [find where interface=ether3] path-cost=30
</pre>
* Use the following commands on '''R1_2''':
<pre>
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether1] path-cost=30
</pre>
{{Cont}}
[[Category:Manual]]
[[Category:Bridging and switching]]

Latest revision as of 12:31, 25 February 2021


Spanning Tree Protocol

RouterOS is capable of running bridge interfaces with (R/M)STP support in order to create a loop-free and Layer2 redundant environment. It is always recommended to manually set up each bridge's priority, port priority, and port path cost to ensure proper Layer2 functionality at all times. Leaving STP related values to defaults are acceptable for a network that consists of 1 to 2 bridges running with (R/M)STP enabled, but it is highly recommended to manually set these values for larger networks. Since STP elects a root bridge and root ports by checking STP related values from bridges over the network, then leaving STP settings to automatic may elect an undesired root bridge and root ports and in case of a hardware failure can result in an inaccessible network.

You can check the STP status of a bridge by using the /interface bridge monitor command, for example:

/interface bridge monitor bridge
                  state: enabled
    current-mac-address: 64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
            root-bridge: yes
         root-bridge-id: 0x3000.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
         root-path-cost: 0
              root-port: none
             port-count: 5
  designated-port-count: 5

You can check the STP status of a bridge port by using the /interface bridge port monitor command, for example:

/interface bridge port monitor 2
               interface: ether3
                  status: in-bridge
             port-number: 3
                    role: root-port
               edge-port: no
     edge-port-discovery: yes
     point-to-point-port: yes
            external-fdb: no
            sending-rstp: yes
                learning: yes
              forwarding: yes
          root-path-cost: 10
       designated-bridge: 0x3000.64:D1:54:D9:27:E6
         designated-cost: 0
  designated-port-number: 4
        hw-offload-group: switch1

Note that root-bridge-id consists of the bridge priority and the bridge's MAC address, for non-root bridges the root bridge will be shown as designated-bridge. One port can have one role in an STP enabled network, below is a list of possible port roles:

  • root-port - port that is facing towards the root bridge and will be used to forward traffic from/to the root bridge.
  • alternate-port - port that is facing towards root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for root port).
  • backup-port - port that is facing away from the root bridge, but is not going to forward traffic (a backup for non-root port).
  • designated-port - port that is facing away from the root bridge and is going to forward traffic.
  • disabled-port - disabled or inactive port.

Note: When using bridges that are set to use 802.1Q as EtherType, they will send out BPDUs to 01:80:C2:00:00:00, which are used by MSTP, RSTP and STP. When using 802.1ad as bridge VLAN protocol, the BPDUs are not compatible with 802.1Q bridges and they are sent to 01:80:C2:00:00:08. (R/M)STP will not function properly if there are different bridge VLAN protocols across the Layer2 network.


STP and RSTP

STP and Rapid STP are used very widely across many networks, but almost all networks have switched over using only RSTP since of its benefits. STP is a very old protocol and has a convergence time (the time needed to fully learn network topology changes and to continue properly forwarding traffic) even up to 50 seconds, which was acceptable for the 1980s when it was invented. RSTP has a lot of smaller convergence time, a few seconds or even a few milliseconds), which is acceptable for nowadays network requirements. It is recommended to use RSTP instead of STP since it is a lot faster and is also backward compatible with STP. One of the reasons why RSTP is faster is because of reduced possible port states, below is a list of possible STP port states:

  • Forwarding - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
  • Listening - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs.
  • Learning - port does not participate in traffic forwarding but is learning MAC addresses.
  • Blocking - port is blocked since it is causing loops but is receiving BPDUs.
  • Disabled - port is disabled or inactive.

In RSTP the disabled, listening and blocking port states are replaced with just one state called the Discarding state:

  • Forwarding - port participates in traffic forwarding and is learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs (forwarding=yes).
  • Learning - port does not participate in traffic forwarding but is learning MAC addresses (learning=yes).
  • Discarding - port does not participate in traffic forwarding and is not learning MAC addresses, is receiving BPDUs (forwarding=no).

In STP connectivity between bridges is determined by sending and receiving BPDUs between neighbor bridges. Designated ports are sending BPDUs to root ports. If a BPDU is not received 3 times the HelloTime in a row, then the connection is considered as unavailable and network topology convergence will commence. It is possible for STP to reduce the convergence time in certain scenarios by reducing the forward-delay timer, which is responsible for how long can the port be in the learning/listening state.

In RouterOS, it is possible to specify which bridge ports are edge ports. Edge ports are ports that are not supposed to receive any BPDUs, this is beneficial since this allows STP to skip the learning and the listening state and directly go to the forwarding state. This feature is sometimes called PortFast· You can leave this parameter to the default value, which is auto, but you can also manually specify it, you can set a port as edge port manually for ports that should not have any more bridges behind it, usually these are access ports.

Default values

When creating a bridge or adding a port to a bridge the following are the default values that are assigned by RouterOS:

  • Default bridge priority: 32768 / 0x8000
  • Default bridge port path cost: 10
  • Default bridge port priority: 0x80
  • BPDU message age increment: 1
  • HelloTime: 2
  • Default max message age: 20

RouterOS does not change port path cost based on the link speed, for 10M, 100M, 1000M and 10000M link speeds the default path cost value when a port is added to a bridge are always 10. The age of a BPDU is determined by how many bridges have the BPDU passed times the message age since RouterOS uses 1 as the message age increment, then the BPDU packet can pass as many bridges as specified in the max-message-age parameter. By default this value is set to 20, this means that after the 20th bridge the BPDU packet will be discarded and the next bridge will become a root bridge, note that if max-message-age=20on is set, then it is hard to predict which ports will be the designated port on the 21st bridge and may result in traffic not being able to be forwarded properly. In case bridge filter rules are used, make sure you allow packets with DST-MAC address 01:80:C2:00:00:00 since these packets carry BPDUs that are crucial for STP to work properly.

Election process

To properly configure STP in your network you need to understand the election process and which parameters are involved in which order. In RouterOS the root bridge will be elected based on the smallest priority and the smallest MAC address in this particular order:

  1. Bridge priority (lowest)
  2. Bridge MAC address (lowest)

In RouterOS root ports are elected based on lowest Root port path cost, lowest bridge identifier, and lowest bridge port ID in this particular order:

  1. Root port path cost (lowest)
  2. Bridge identifier (lowest)
  3. Bridge port ID (lowest)

First, when the device considers which of its ports to elect as the root port, it will check the root path cost seen by its ports. If root path cost is the same for two or more ports then the Bridge identifier of the upstream device will be checked and port connected to the lowest bridge identifier will become the root port. If the same bridge identifier is seen on two or more ports, then Bridge port ID of upstream device will be checked.

Explanation of attributes:

Root path cost, all bridges have a Root Path Cost. Root bridge has a root path cost of 0. For all other Bridges, it is the sum of the Port Path Costs on the least-cost path to the Root Bridge. You can modify local port path cost under "/interface bridge port".

Bridge identifier is a combination of "bridge priority" and "bridge MAC", configurable under "/interface bridge"

Bridge port ID is a combination of "unique ID" and "bridge port priority", the unique ID is automatically assigned to bridge port upon adding it to the bridge, it cannot be edited. It can be seen in WinBox under "Bridge Port" "Port Number" column, or with "/interface bridge port monitor", as "port-number".

Note: Make sure you are using path cost and priority on the right ports. For example, setting path cost on ports that are in a root bridge has no effect, only port priority has an effect on them. Root path cost has an effect on ports that are facing towards the root bridge and port priority has an effect on ports that are facing away from the root bridge. And bridge identifier doesn’t impact devices own root port election, instead it affects root port election for downstream devices.


Warning: In RouterOS it is possible to set any value for bridge priority between 0 and 65535, the IEEE 802.1W standard states that the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096. This can cause incompatibility issues between devices that do not support such values. To avoid incompatibility issues, it is recommended to use only these priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440.


Example

Alt text
Topology of a STP enabled network

In this example, we want to ensure Layer2 redundancy for connections from ServerA to ServerB. If a port is connected to a device that is not a bridge and not running (R)STP, then this port is considered as an edge port, in this case ServerA and ServerB is connected to an edge port. This is possible by using STP in a network. Below are configuration examples for each switch.

  • Configuration for SW1:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge priority=0x1000
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1 priority=0x60
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2 priority=0x50
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3 priority=0x40
add bridge=bridge interface=ether4 priority=0x30
add bridge=bridge interface=ether5
  • Configuration for SW2:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge priority=0x2000
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3
  • Configuration for SW3:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge priority=0x3000
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3
  • Configuration for SW4:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge priority=0x4000
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2 path-cost=20
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3

In this example SW1 is the root bridge since it has the lowest bridge priority. SW2 and SW3 has ether1,ether2 connected to the root bridge and ether3 is connected to SW4. When all switches are working properly, the traffic will be flowing from ServerA through SW1_ether2, through SW2, through SW4 to ServerB. In case of SW1 failure, the SW2 becomes the root bridge because of the next lowest priority. Below is a list of ports and their role for each switch:

  • root-port - SW2_ether2, SW3_ether2, SW4_ether1
  • alternate-port - SW2_ether1, SW3_ether1, SW4_ether2
  • designated-port - SW1_ether1, SW1_ether2, SW1_ether3, SW1_ether4, SW1_ether5, SW2_ether3, SW2_ether3, SW4_ether3

Note: By the 802.1W recommendations, you should use bridge priorities in steps of 4096. To set a recommended priority it is more convenient to use hexadecimal notation, for example, 0 is 0x0000, 4096 is 0x1000, 8192 is 0x2000 and so on (0..F).


Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol

Since RouterOS v6.41 it is possible to enable Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) on a bridge interface to ensure loop-free topology across multiple VLANs, MSTP can also provide Layer2 redundancy and can be used as a load balancing technique for VLANs since it has the ability to have different paths across different VLANs. MSTP is operating very similarly to (R)STP and many concepts from (R)STP can be applied to MSTP and it is highly recommended to understand the principles behind (R)STP before using MSTP, but there are some differences that must be taken into account when designing a MSTP enabled network.

In case (R)STP is used, the BPDUs are sent across all physical interfaces in a bridge to determine loops and stop ports from being able to forward traffic, if it causes a loop. In case there is a loop inside a certain VLAN, (R)STP might not be able to detect it. Some STP variants solve this problem by running a STP instance on every single VLAN (PVST), but this has been proven to inefficient and some STP variants solve this problem by running a single STP instance across all VLANs (CST), but it lacks the possibility to do load balancing for each VLAN or VLAN group. MSTP tends to solve both problems by using MST instances that can define a group of VLANs (VLAN mapping) that can be used for load balancing and redundancy, this means that each VLAN group can have a different root bridge and a different path. Note that it is beneficial to group multiple VLANs in a single instance to reduce the amount of CPU cycles for each network topology change.

Warning: In RouterOS with MSTP enabled the bridge priority is the CIST's root bridge priority, as stated in the IEEE 802.1Q standard the bridge priority must be in steps of 4096, the 12 lowest bits are ignored. These are valid bridge priorities: 0, 4096, 8192, 12288, 16384, 20480, 24576, 28672, 32768, 36864, 40960, 45056, 49152, 53248, 57344, 61440. When setting an invalid bridge priority, RouterOS will warn you about it and trunk the value to a valid value, but will save the original value in the configuration since invalid bridge priority values can still be used in (R)STP between devices running RouterOS, though it is recommended to use valid a bridge priority instead.


MSTP Regions

MSTP works in groups called regions, for each region there will be a regional root bridge and between regions there will be a root bridge elected. MSTP will use Internal Spanning Tree (IST) to build the network topology inside a region and Common Spanning Tree (CST) outside a region to build the network topology between multiple regions, MSTP combines these two protocols into Common and Internal Spanning Tree (CIST), which holds information about topology inside a region and between regions. From CST's perspective a region will seemingly be as a single virtual bridge, because of this MSTP is considered very scalable for large networks. In order for bridges to be in the same region, their configuration must match, BPDUs will not include VLAN mappings since they can be large, rather a computed hash is being transmitted. If a bridge receives a BPDU through a port and the configuration does not match, then MSTP will consider that port as a boundary port and that it can be used to reach other regions. Below is a list of parameters that need to match in order for MSTP to consider a BPDU from the same region:

  • Region name
  • Region revision
  • VLAN mappings to MST Instance IDs (computed hash)

It is possible to create MSTP enabled network without regions, though to be able to do load balancing per VLAN group it is required for a bridge to receive a BPDU from a bridge that is connected to it with the same parameters mentioned above. In RouterOS the default region name is empty and region revision is 0, which are valid values, but you must make sure that they match in order to get multiple bridges in a single MSTP region. A region cannot exist if their bridges are scattered over the network, these bridges must be connected at least in one way, in which they can send and receive BPDUs without leaving the region, for example, if a bridge with different region related parameters is between two bridges that have the same region related parameters, then there will exist at least 3 different MSTP regions.

Alt text
Topology of a MSTP enabled network with boundary ports

The downside of running every single bridge in a single MSTP region is the excess CPU cycles. In comparison, PVST(+) creates a Spanning Tree Instance for each VLAN ID that exists on the network, since there will be very limited paths that can exist in a network, then this approach creates a lot of overhead and unnecessary CPU cycles, this also means that this approach does not scale very well and can overload switches with not very powerful CPUs. MSTP solves this problem by dividing the network into MSTP regions, where each bridge inside this region will exchange and process information about VLANs that exist inside the same region, but will run a single instance of Spanning Tree Protocol in background to maintain the network topology between regions. This approach has been proven to be much more effective and much more scalable, this means that regions should be used for larger networks to reduce CPU cycles.

In regions you can define MST Instances, which are used to configure load balancing per VLAN group and to elect the regional root bridge. It is worth mentioning that in each region there exists a pre-defined MST Instance, in most documentations this is called as MSTI0· This MST Instance is considered as the default MST Instance, there are certain parameters that apply to this special MST Instance. When traffic is passing through a MSTP enabled bridge, MSTP will look for a MST Instance that has a matching VLAN mapping, but if a VLAN mapping does not exists for a certain VLAN ID, then traffic will fall under MSTI0.

Note: Since MSTP requires VLAN filtering on the bridge interface to be enabled, then make sure that you have allowed all required VLAN IDs in /interface bridge vlan, otherwise the traffic will not be forwarded and it might seem as MSTP misconfigured, although this is a VLAN filtering misconfiguration.


Election process

The election process in MSTP can be divided into two sections, intra region and inter region. For MSTP to work properly there will always need to be a regional root, that is the root bridge inside a region, and a CIST root, that is the root bridge between regions. A regional root is the root bridge inside a region, regional root bridge will be needed to properly set up load balancing for VLAN groups inside a region. CIST root will be used to configure which ports will be alternate/backups ports (inactive) and which ports will be root ports (active).

Note: Between regions there is no load balancing per VLAN group, root port election process and port blocking between MSTP regions is done the same way as in (R)STP. If CIST has blocked a port that is inside a MSTP region to prevent traffic loops between MSTP regions, then this port can still be active for IST to do load balancing per VLAN group inside a MSTP region.


  • The following parameters are involved to elect a regional root bridge or root ports inside a MSTP region:
Property Description
priority (integer: 0..65535 decimal format or 0x0000-0xffff hex format; Default: 32768 / 0x8000) /interface bridge msti, MST Instance priority, used to elect a regional root inside a MSTP region.
internal-path-cost (integer: 1..4294967295; Default: 10) /interface bridge port, path cost to the regional root for unknown VLAN IDs (MSTI0), used on a root port inside a MSTP region.
priority (integer: 0..240; Default: 128) /interface bridge port mst-override, MST port priority for a defined MST Instance, used on a bridge port on the regional root bridge.
internal-path-cost (integer: 1..200000000; Default: 10) /interface bridge port mst-override, MST port path cost for a defined MST Instance, used on a non-root bridge port inside a MSTP region.


  • The following parameters are involved to elect a CIST root bridge or CIST root ports:
Property Description
priority (integer: 0..65535 decimal format or 0x0000-0xffff hex format; Default: 32768 / 0x8000) /interface bridge, CIST bridge priority, used to elect a CIST root bridge.
priority (integer: 0..240; Default: 128) /interface bridge port, CIST port priority, used on a CIST root bridge to elect CIST root ports.
path-cost (integer: 1..4294967295; Default: 10) /interface bridge port, CIST port path cost, used on a CIST non-root bridge port to elect CIST root ports.

Note: The sequence of parameters in which MSTP checks to elect root bridge/ports are the same as in (R)STP, you can read more about it at the (R)STP Election Process section.


MST Instance

Sub-menu: /interface bridge msti

This section is used to group multiple VLAN IDs to a single instance to create a different root bridge for each VLAN group inside a MSTP region.

Property Description
bridge (text; Default: ) Bridge to which assign a MST instance.
identifier (integer: 1..31; Default: ) MST instance identifier.
priority (integer: 0..65535 decimal format or 0x0000-0xffff hex format; Default: 32768 / 0x8000) MST instance priority, used to determine the root bridge for a group of VLANs in a MSTP region.
vlan-mapping (integer: 1..4094; Default: ) The list of VLAN IDs to assign to MST instance. This setting accepts VLAN ID range as well as comma separated values. E.g. vlan-mapping=100-115,120,122,128-130

MST Override

Sub-menu: /interface bridge port mst-override

This section is used to select desired path for each VLAN mapping inside a MSTP region.

Property Description
disabled (yes | no; Default: no) Whether entry is disabled.
internal-path-cost (integer: 1..200000000; Default: 10) Path cost for a MST instance's VLAN mapping, used on VLANs that are facing towards the root bridge to manipulate path selection, lower path cost is preferred.
identifier (integer: 1..31; Default: ) MST instance identifier.
priority (integer: 0..240; Default: 128) The priority a MST instance's VLAN, used on VLANs that are facing away from the root bridge to manipulate path selection, lower priority is preferred.
interface (name; Default: ) Name of the port on which use configured MST instance's VLAN mappings and defined path cost and priority.

Monitoring

Similarly to (R)STP, it is also possible to monitor MSTP status. By monitoring the bridge interface itself it possible to see the current CIST root bridge and the current regional root bridge for MSTI0, it is also possible to see the computed hash of MST Instance identifiers and VLAN mappings, this is useful when making sure that certain bridges are in the same MSTP region. Below you can find an example to monitoring a MSTP bridge:

/interface bridge monitor bridge
                    state: enabled
      current-mac-address: 6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
              root-bridge: no
           root-bridge-id: 0x1000.64:D1:54:24:23:72
  regional-root-bridge-id: 0x4000.6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
           root-path-cost: 10
                root-port: ether4
               port-count: 5
    designated-port-count: 3
        mst-config-digest: 74edbeefdbf82cf63a70cf60e43a56f3

In MSTP it is possible to monitor the MST Instance, this is useful to determine the current regional root bridge for a certain MST Instance and VLAN group, below you can find an example to monitor a MST Instance:

/interface bridge msti monitor 1
                    state: enabled
               identifier: 2
      current-mac-address: 6C:3B:6B:7B:F0:AA
              root-bridge: no
           root-bridge-id: 0.00:00:00:00:00:00
  regional-root-bridge-id: 0x1002.6C:3B:6B:7B:F9:08
           root-path-cost: 0
                root-port: ether2
               port-count: 5
    designated-port-count: 1

It is also possible to monitor a certain MST Override entry, this is useful to determine the port role for a certain MST Instance when configuring root ports and alternate/backup ports in a MSTP region, below you can find an example to monitor a MST Override entry:

/interface bridge port mst-override monitor 1
                      port: ether3
                    status: active
                identifier: 2
                      role: alternate-port
                  learning: no
                forwarding: no
   internal-root-path-cost: 15
         designated-bridge: 0x1002.6C:3B:6B:7B:F9:08
  designated-internal-cost: 0
    designated-port-number: 130

Example

Lets say that we need to design a topology and configure MSTP in a way that VLAN 10,20 will be forwarded in one path, but VLAN 30,40 will be forwarded in a different path, while all other VLAN IDs will be forwarded in one of those paths. This can easily be done by setting up MST Instances and assigning port path costs, below you can find a network topology that needs to do load balancing per VLAN group with 3 separate regions as an example:

Alt text
Topology of a MSTP enabled network with load balancing per VLAN group

Start by adding each interface to a bridge, initially you should create a (R)STP bridge without VLAN filtering enabled, this is to prevent loosing access to the CPU. Each device in this example is named by the region that it is in (Rx) and a device number (_x). For larger networks configuring MSTP can confusing because of the amount of links and devices, we recommend using The Dude to monitor and design a network topology.

  • Use the following commands on R1_1, R1_3, R2_1, R2_3, R3_1, R3_3:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge protocol-mode=rstp vlan-filtering=no
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
add bridge=bridge interface=ether3
add bridge=bridge interface=ether4
  • Use the following commands on R1_2, R2_2, R3_2:
/interface bridge
add name=bridge protocol-mode=rstp vlan-filtering=no
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge interface=ether1
add bridge=bridge interface=ether2
  • Make sure you allow the required VLAN IDs on these devices, here we will consider that each device will receive tagged traffic that needs to be load balanced per VLAN group, use these commands on R1_1, R1_3, R2_1, R2_3, R3_1, R3_3:
/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge tagged=ether1,ether2,ether3,ether4 vlan-ids=10,20,30,40
  • Use the following commands on R1_2, R2_2, R3_2:
/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge tagged=ether1,ether2 vlan-ids=10,20,30,40

Note: Make sure you add all the needed VLAN IDs and ports to the bridge VLAN table, otherwise your device will not forward all required VLANs and/or you will loose access to the device. You can read about how to set up management ports with bridge VLAN filtering at the Management port section.


We need to assign a region name for each bridge that we want to be in a single MSTP region, you can also specify the region revision, but it is optional, though they need to match. In this example if all bridges will have the same region name, then they will all be in a single MSTP bridge. In this case we want to separate a group of 3 bridges in a different MSTP region to do load balancing per VLAN group and to create diversity and scalability.

  • Set appropriate region name (and region revision) for each bridge, use the following commands on each device (change the region name!):
/interface bridge
set bridge region-name=Rx region-revision=1

After we have created 3 different MSTP regions, we need to decide which device is going to be a regional root for each VLAN group. For consistency we are going to set the first device (_1) in each region as the regional root for VLAN 10,20 and the third device (_3) in each region as the regional root for VLAN 30,40. This can be done by creating a MST Instance for each VLAN group and assigning a bridge priority to it. The MST Instance identifier is only relevant inside a MSTP region, outside a MSTP region these identifiers can be different and mapped to a different VLAN group.

  • Use the following commands on R1_1, R2_1, R3_1:
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x1000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x3000 vlan-mapping=30,40
  • Use the following commands on R1_3, R2_3, R3_3:
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x3000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x1000 vlan-mapping=30,40
  • Use the following commands on R1_2, R2_2, R3_2:
/interface bridge msti
add bridge=bridge identifier=1 priority=0x2000 vlan-mapping=10,20
add bridge=bridge identifier=2 priority=0x2000 vlan-mapping=30,40

Now we need to override the port path-cost and/or port priority for each MST Instance. This can be done by adding a MST-Override entry for each port and each MST Instance. To achieve that for a certain MST Instance the traffic flow path is different, we simply need to make sure that the port path cost and/or priority is larger. We can either increase the port path cost or either decrease the port path cost to ports that are facing towards the regional root bridge. It doesn't matter if you increase or decrease all values, it is important that at the end one port's path cost is larger than the other's.

  • Use the following commands on R1_1, R2_1, R3_1:
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=2 interface=ether1 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=2 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=15
  • Use the following commands on R1_2, R2_2, R3_2:
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=1 interface=ether1 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=2 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=9
  • Use the following commands on R1_3, R2_3, R3_3:
/interface bridge port mst-override
add identifier=1 interface=ether2 internal-path-cost=5
add identifier=1 interface=ether3 internal-path-cost=9

In this case for VLAN 10,20 to reach the third device from the first device it would choose between ether1 and ether2, one port will be blocked and set as an alternate port, ether1 will have path cost as 5+9=14 and ether2 will have path cost as 10, ether2 will be elected as the root port for MSTI1 on the third device. In case for VLAN 30,40 to reach the first device from the third device, ether1 will have path cost as 5+9=14 and ether2 will have path cost as 15, ether1 will be elected as the root port for MSTI2 on the third device.

Now we can configure the root ports for MSTI0, in which will fall under all VLANs that are not assigned to a specific MST Instance, like in our example VLAN 10,20 and VLAN 30,40. To configure this special MST Instance, you will need to specify internal-path-cost to a bridge port. This value is only relevant to MSTP regions, it does not have any effect outside a MSTP region. In this example will choose that all unknown VLANs will be forwarded over the same path as VLAN 30,40, we will simply increase the path cost on one of the ports.

  • Use the following commands on R1_3, R2_3, R3_3:
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether3] internal-path-cost=25

At this point a single region MSTP can be considered as configured and in general MSTP is fully functional. It is highly recommended to configure the CIST part, but for testing purposes it can be left with the default values. Before doing any tests, you need to enable MSTP on all bridges.

  • Use the following commands on all devices:
/interface bridge
set bridge protocol-mode=mstp vlan-filtering=yes

When MSTP regions have been configured, you can check if they are properly configured by forwarding traffic, for example, send tagged traffic from the first device to the third device and change the VLAN ID for the tagged traffic to observe different paths based on VLAN ID. When this is working as expected, then you can continue to configure CIST related parameters to elect a CIST root bridge and CIST root ports. For consistency we will choose the first device in the first region to be the CIST root bridge and to ensure the consistency in case of failure we can set a higher priority to all other bridges.

  • Use the following commands on R1_1:
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x1000
  • Use the following commands on R1_2:
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x2000
  • ...
  • Use the following commands on R3_3:
/interface bridge
set bridge priority=0x9000

We also need to elect a root port on each bridge, for simplicity we will choose the port that is closest to Ŗ1_1 as the root port and has the least hops. At this point the procedure to elect root ports is the same as the procedure in (R)STP.

  • Use the following commands on R3_3:
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether2] path-cost=30
set [find where interface=ether3] path-cost=40
set [find where interface=ether4] path-cost=20
  • Use the following commands on R1_3 and R2_3:
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether2] path-cost=20
set [find where interface=ether3] path-cost=30
  • Use the following commands on R1_2:
/interface bridge port
set [find where interface=ether1] path-cost=30

[ Top | Back to Content ]